No, miracles do not violate the laws of nature

David Hume made a famous argument against miracles. Little known, some of his contemporaries refuted him. Better known, C.S. Lewis took him to task in his book miracles. Erik Manning, in this article, does a good job of laying out the issue and providing an answer.

No, miracles do not violate the laws of nature

Advertisements

Published by Haden Clark

Husband / Dog Dad / B.A. Business Administration / M.A. Theological Studies / M.B.A. Finance

4 thoughts on “No, miracles do not violate the laws of nature

  1. Lewis was the misguided oaf who coined the pithy Liar, Lunatic, Lord, argument, quite forgetting, of course, there was at least one more option with an ‘L’ and others that began with different letters of the alphabet. so it would be foolish to go by anything Lewis had to say.

    However, I suppose uttering up a prayer to your god to find your lost car keys and when they em>suddenly appear on the coffee table I suppose one could call a miracle. However, this begs the question why your god is either indifferent or impotent to save the lives tens of thousands of children under 5 that die each year from preventable diseases?
    Perhaps he’s watching the ball game?

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: